Worldreefs.info – Roiy's Reef

Lighting: Metal Halide Ballasts

Metal Halide Ballasts

Like other discharge light sources, high-intensity discharge (HID) metal halide lamps require a ballast to limit current to the electrodes. Ballasts also provide the correct voltage for starting and restarting, and they adjust current to maintain light color and intensity over time. All ballasts suffer internal losses—ranging from 5 to 90 percent of the lamp wattage—that should be included in any calculation of potential savings, especially when switching from nonballasted sources such as incandescent lamps. Two main types of ballasts are now available: the newer electronic ballasts and the more common magnetic ones

What Are the Options?
Magnetic Ballasts

Up until a few years ago, magnetic ballasts were the only option for HID light sources, and they are still the type that is most often used. The most common type of magnetic ballast sold today is the constant-wattage autotransformer, which effectively regulates lamp power to minimize flicker and unexpected shutoffs if the line voltage varies. Composed mainly of magnetic coils, these ballasts often include a capacitor in the circuitry to improve power factor. Magnetic ballasts generally have internal losses of at least 10 percent of the lamp wattage—and the percentage is even higher for lower-wattage lamps. Manufacturers produce magnetic ballasts capable of working with lamps of up to 1,500 watts (W).

Electronic Ballasts

Electronic ballasts are a relatively new offering, and they are now available for lamps of up to 450 W. They use switching electronics and small high-frequency inductors, rather than large line-frequency ones, to control current and voltage to the lamp. Though costly, electronic ballasts offer a host of benefits over their magnetic counterparts, including higher efficiency, better dimming capabilities, better light quality, and shorter warm-up times.

Efficiency. Electronic ballasts for HID lamps consume about 60 percent less power than their magnetic equivalents—a typical electronic ballast for a 400-W lamp uses 15 to 30 W, compared with 50 to 60 W for a magnetic unit.

Light output. Metal halide lamps are notorious for the color variability of their light output, but lamps operated by electronic metal halide ballasts provide more stable output than lamps operated by magnetic ballasts. That's because the electronic ballasts reduce the variability of the voltage supplied to the lamp.

The light output of lamps driven by electronic ballasts also degrades more slowly over time, resulting in greater light output at the mean and end of the lamp's life (see Figure 1). This in turn enables systems with electronic ballasts to use fewer fixtures, or lower-wattage lamps, to provide the same output as systems with magnetic ballasts.

Figure 1: Electronic ballasts improve lumen maintenance
Figure 1: Electronic ballasts improve lumen maintenance

Lamp output degrades more slowly with electronic ballasts than with magnetic ballasts. Output declines more rapidly on probe-start metal halide lamps operating on magnetic ballasts.

Source: Platts; data from Advance Transformer

Dimming capability. Electronic ballasts can be made continuously dimmable, down to about 50 percent of full output power. This characteristic makes them more amenable to daylight harvesting than magnetic ballasts, which, at best, offer step-dimming down to one or two lower levels. Step-dimming to 50 percent of maximum light output is common in warehouses and other irregularly occupied building spaces. Electronic ballasts also have greater dimming efficiency than magnetic ones. A magnetic ballast step-dimmed to 50 percent of maximum light output typically consumes 65 percent of full power, whereas the ratio of light output to power input for an electronic ballast is nearly one-to-one. However, dimming any HID lamp, even with an electronic ballast, may lead to significant color-shifting, seriously limiting this capability in areas where color is of concern.

Warm-up and restrike times. Metal halide lamps take several minutes to warm up to full output and several minutes to cool down and restart once they go out (either intentionally or due to a power failure). With electronic ballasts, warm-up times are significantly shortened for both quartz and ceramic lamps, but restrike times (the time it takes for a lamp to cool down and restart after a momentary outage) are only shortened for quartz lamps (see Table 1). None of the times is shortened to the point where metal halide lamps can be used with on/off controls.

Table 1: Warm-up and restrike times for metal halide lamps
Table 1: Warm-up and restrike times for metal halide lamps

Electronic ballasts have shortened warm-up and restrike times for pulse-start metal halide lamps. The ranges of values account for differences in ballast starting techniques, fixture heat dissipation, lamp type (coated or clear, open or enclosed rating), lamp age, and whether or not there is a hot restrike capability.

Source: Platts; data from Stan Walerczyk

Noise. Magnetic ballasts produce noise because the metal laminations within them vibrate as the magnetic field changes at the line frequency of 60 times per second. Electronic ballast products are available that operate at both high and low frequencies, but operation is silent because the ballasts don't have laminations to vibrate. This quality is important in areas such as libraries, concert halls, and retail shops.

Light flicker. Some electronic ballasts for metal halide lamps operate at much higher frequencies than the 60 hertz (Hz) of magnetic ballasts. This high-frequency operation eliminates the flicker that can accompany line-frequency operation and can cause headaches or otherwise affect a room's occupants. High-frequency electronic ballasts also eliminate the stroboscopic effect. Although other types of lamp flicker are just annoying, the stroboscopic effect can be dangerous. When circular saws, drill presses, and other machinery operate at a certain speed, the stroboscopic effect from magnetic ballasts can cause the machines to appear as if they are not operating. Other electronic ballasts operate at lower frequencies (75 Hz for one product), but they have a square wave design that also eliminates flicker.

Reduced stock variety. The use of dimming electronic ballasts allows a facility to minimize the different types of lamps and ballasts it must keep on hand—making inventory tracking easier and eliminating the risk that the wrong lamp would be installed. For example, instead of having to purchase, stock, and replace 250-, 320-, and 400-W pulse-start metal halide lamps and ballasts, a facility can stock just 400-W lamps and use dimming electronic ballasts to get the right light levels. This also enables the facility to take advantage of the 400-W lamps' longer life—20,000 hours versus just 15,000 hours for 250-W lamps.

Longer lamp life. Ballast manufacturers report that pulse-start metal halide lamp life may be increased by about 25 percent through the use of electronic ballasts. This effect is plausible, because electronic ballasts provide more-precise control of current and therefore place less stress on electrodes when a lamp is started. But as of yet, no independent confirmations of increased lamp life have been made, and it may take some time for manufacturers to verify longer lamp life. Meanwhile, when trying to estimate the life of a lamp operating with a particular electronic ballast, use data from a lamp manufacturer rather than from a ballast manufacturer.

Cost. Incremental costs for electronic ballasts have been running $60 to $150 above the $30 cost of magnetic pulse-start metal halide ballasts. However, electronic ballasts have reasonable simple-payback periods over magnetic ballasts based on efficiency and lumen depreciation alone (see Table 2).

Table 2: Cost comparison—electronic versus magnetic ballasts
Table 2: Cost comparison—electronic versus magnetic ballasts

Systems with electronic ballasts currently cost significantly more than those with magnetic ballasts. However, energy savings can lead to a reasonable payback, depending on the application.

Source: Platts

How to Make the Best Choice?

Electronic ballasts for HID light sources offer various benefits over magnetic ballasts: greater efficiency, greater light and color stability, lower lumen depreciation, better dimming options, faster warm-up and restrike times, less noise, elimination of flicker, and longer lamp life. However, they do carry a higher cost. To determine if electronic ballasts are a cost-effective solution, conduct a cost analysis that considers these five ballast/lamp parameters: ballast power, lumen maintenance (a measure of lamp light depreciation over time), lamp life, and end-of-life output. Other factors include the operational hours in a year, the cost of electricity, and the cost of the ballasts.

When choosing a particular electronic ballast, make sure that it is compatible with the lamp and that the ballast's rated operating temperature falls into a range in which the ballast is expected to operate. Also, because electronic ballasts are a relatively new technology, there have been some reliability questions—look for manufacturers with a good track record.

What's on the Horizon?

Although electronic ballasts are more expensive than magnetic ballasts, the incremental cost of electronic ballasts should drop and reliability should improve as sales volumes increase and manufacturers introduce new products and gain more experience.

Newer, more-capable wireless systems, some of which are available today, may broaden the wireless lighting market considerably if costs can be reduced. Due to their enhanced dimming properties, electronic ballasts may one day be controlled via wireless controllers, providing an opportunity to enhance an existing electronic ballast system with daylighting capabilities. These newer wireless systems should begin to appear on the market in 2006.

Taken from: http://www.reliant.com/en_US/Page/Generic/Public/esc_purchasing_advisor_metal_halide_ballasts_bus_gen.jsp.

Tags: , , ,
September 26, 2009 - 4:25 PM No Comments

What is Color Rendering Index – CRI ?

What is Color Rendering Index – CRI

Color rendering describes how a light source makes the color of an object appear to human eyes and how well subtle variations in color shades are revealed. The Color Rendering Index (CRI) is a scale from 0 to 100 percent indicating how accurate a "given" light source is at rendering color when compared to a "reference" light source.

The higher the CRI, the better the color rendering ability. Light sources with a CRI of 85 to 90 are considered good at color rendering. Light sources with a CRI of 90 or higher are excellent at color rendering and should be used for tasks requiring the most accurate color discrimination.

It is important to note that CRI is independent of color temperature (see discussion of color temperature). Examples: A 2700K ("warm") color temperature incandescent light source has a CRI of 100. One 5000K ("daylight") color temperature fluorescent light source has a CRI of 75 and another with the same color temperature has a CRI of 90.

To further understand the physics of color rendering, we need to look at spectral power distribution.

What is spectral power distribution?
The visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum is composed of radiation with wavelengths from approximately 400 to 750 nanometers. The blue part of the visible spectrum is the shorter wavelength and the red part is the longer wavelength with all color gradations in between.

Visible Spectrum

Spectral power distribution graphs show the relative power of wavelengths across the visible spectrum for a given light source. These graphs also reveal the ability of a light source to render all, or, selected colors.

Below see how a typical spectral power distribution graph for daylight.

Daylight Spectral Power Distribution

Notice the strong presence (high relative power) of ALL wavelengths (or the "full color spectrum"). Daylight provides the highest level of color rendering across the spectrum.

Compare the daylight spectral power distribution with that for a particular fluorescent lamp.

Daylight Spectral Power Distribution

The most obvious difference is the generally lower level of relative power compared to daylight – - except for a few spikes. All wavelengths (the "full spectrum) are again present but only certain wavelengths (the spikes) are strongly present. These spikes indicate which parts of the color spectrum will be emphasized in the rendering of color for objects illuminated by the light source. This lamp has a 3000K color temperature and a CRI of 82. It produces a light that is perceived as "warmer" than daylight (3000K vs. 5000K). It's ability to render color across the spectrum is not bad, but certainly much worse than daylight. Notice the deep troughs where the curve almost reaches zero relative power at certain wavelengths.

Here is another fluorescent lamp.

Daylight Spectral Power Distribution

This spectral power distribution looks generally similar to the one above except it shows more power at the blue end of the spectrum and less at the red end. Also, there are no low points in the curve that come close to zero power. This lamp has a 5000K color temperature and a CRI of 98. It produces light that is perceived as bluish white (similar to daylight) and it does an excellent job of rendering colors across the spectrum.

Above are links to linear and compact fluorescent light bulbs from Topbulb that have a CRI of 90 or higher. If you want a high color rendering bulb to produce light perceived as warm white, choose a bulb with a color temperature of 3000K or 3500K. If you want a high color rendering bulb to produce light perceived as white, choose a bulb with a color temperature of 4000K. For a bulb that simulates daylight, choose a color temperature of 5000K or higher.

Note: all incandescent and halogen light bulbs, by definition, have a CRI close to 100. They are excellent at rendering color. However, except for some halogen bulbs, most incandescents produce a warm 2800K color temperature. The only way to achieve the bluish white appearance of daylight with incandescent bulbs is to use bulbs coated with neodymium. However, these bulbs have a CRI much lower than 90. They are not good for accurate color rendering across the spectrum. See neodymium light bulbs available from Topbulb.

Taken from – http://www.topbulb.com/find/cri.asp

cri_chart_web

Tags: , , ,
September 10, 2009 - 9:17 AM No Comments

Aquarium Lamp, Bulb Types

Aquarium Lamp, Bulb Types By Carl Strohmeyer

This article will discuss some of the more common aquarium lights (lamps) available as well as a few that are not as well known such as the SHO and T2 bulbs/fixtures.

Common aquarium bulbs include the:

*Metal Halide (MH); These are the reigning "Kings" of reef aquarium due to depth penetration, output, spectrum, and over all beauty and amount of coral life they help support. Even the newer T-5 lamps cannot achieve the depth penetration and overall output of these lights.

Metal Halide work via a gas mixture of halides and other elements. The actual light production comes from the small bubble of gas that is held in place by metal wires and/or supports. The electricity running between them and the small gas bubble, heats them, similar to an incandescent filament. This is one of the reasons that Metal Halide bulbs give off more heat than other bulbs.

The downside is the heat that MH lights produce, often resulting in the need for hood fans and even chillers. Two sizes I most often have used are the 10,000 K 175 watts and the 20,000 K 250 watts for really deep tanks (over 30")

*LED: The new reef compatible LED is likely to take over the market as they become more readily available, the price comes down and watts per lumen come up. These lights do not have the heat problems and are very compact. LED lights may prove to be more suitable for aquatic life tank-lighting and reef tanks because they offer superior flexibility when compared with traditional fluorescent lighting. When LED lights operate, the photometric radiation remains within a narrow band on the electromagnetic spectrum. Specific photometric wavelengths are often beneficial to some aquatic plant life and reef tanks. Controlling specific wavelengths becomes possible through a basic network of colored LED lights connected to a digital LED controller. Since LEDs emit light only in very specific direction, the installer has the option to illuminate a precise area by simply rotating the polycarbonate tube casing. The water resistant casing also provides the LED circuitry with adequate protection against moisture and chemicals found within the fish tank or reef tank.

So far the there are mixed reviews on the larger units such as the Solaris that replace the MH. The manufacturer of the Solaris claims "PAR light output levels equal to a 400W MH 20k. It uses 40% less energy than the 400W MH 20k fixtures it replaces. The life of the LEDs is approximately 50,000 hours, so it almost eliminates metal halide and fluorescent bulb replacements. All heat is radiated up and away from the tank; therefore, it does not heat the water like Metal Halides or Fluorescents. This eliminates the need for Chillers." However data shows 20 lumens per watt, MH bulbs provide around 50 lumens per watt as the output.

*T-12; a standard pin, 1-1/2" wide bulb. This bulb will generally use more watts per lumen output

*T-8; a standard pin, 1" wide bulb. As compared to the T-12, a 48" T-12 will use 32 watts, while a 48" T-8 will use 32 watts.

*T-5; Generally around 13 mm in diameter. This is a mini pin bulb which generally uses even less watts per lumen than many than T-8 bulbs.

*T-2; These bulbs are the latest technology yet. They measure only 7 mm and allow for several bulbs in a small space. A 13 watt 20 inch T-2 Bulb (6400 K) produces 950 lumens which is 73 lumens per watt in a very small space!

Quite bluntly, these T2 lamps and fixtures are about the best bulbs in a small space I have seen! These are very useful for small planted aquariums or Nano Reefs or even shelves for betta breeders. I expect these new T-2 lamps to sweep the smaller aquarium keeping hobby due to their extremely high efficiency and out put.

*VHO; this stands for "Very High Output". These come in T-5 thru T-12 standard fluorescent tubes and in the newer power compact (usually 4 pin) lamps such as the New generation Via Aqua Helios VHO. The new Helios come in a variety of sizes with outputs up to 180 watts out of lamps under 40 inches in length, which rival many Metal Halide (although not in depth penetration). These new higher output VHO fixtures/lamps have higher Kelvin and wattage output than previous generation VHO lamps/fixtures of similar size. These can be used for both marine reef applications as well as freshwater planted aquariums (these new VHOs are not scheduled for full release to the public until early 2008).

*PC; this stands for "Power Compact". These bulbs come in straight pin arrangements, square pin arrangements, and the ever more popular self ballasted standard incandescent fixture "screw in" type. These bulbs along with T-5s tend to be the most efficient.

A new Power Compact that in my opinion is awesome for planted aquariums and even for reef aquariums (as an addition to LED or Metal Halide) is the self ballasted SHO (Super high Output) PC bulbs. The 105 Watt SHO Daylight bulb puts out 6300 lumens and is comparable to a 525 watt Standard bulb (click on the picture for a link). This comes out to 60 lumens per watt, however this is a deceptive guide, as you can fit many more of these bulbs in a given space and also utilize more efficient reflectors.

The SHO can be mounted into your hood using a standard incandescent fixture or better, hung as a pendant light using reflector similar to how Metal Halides are commonly installed

For more information about aquarium lighting, please see this URL from which this article is snipped in the resource box:

Tags: , ,
July 22, 2009 - 4:07 PM No Comments
design-gezunt